Former FDA Auditor Says Monitoring Has Gotten Sloppy and Sponsors Are Not Happy With CRO’s

Share Button


I was fortunate enough to finally meet Pat Stone, the former FDA auditor who has appeared on this blog many times throughout the years. In this interview Pat and I discuss how risk based monitoring is being viewed by the FDA and why many in the industry believe that monitoring has been really sloppy as of late. There were many interesting things that I learned during this mini-interview but the most striking was probably the fact that Sponsors routinely report CRO’s to the FDA anonymously for lackluster clinical trial management! This would add some further support to my theory that Sponsors are using this time of low study activities to square off CRO’s against each other and see who can perform better. I could not believe this, but apparently it occurs quite a bit. There are many other insightful findings here and I hope you find a few helpful.
quotescover-JPG-15

Share Button

Clinical Trial Supply and Demand and the Sponsor-CRO Relationship

Share Button


In today’s video I share some anecdotal evidence of a particular trend I am seeing as of late in clinical research: Sponsors choosing two CRO’s to conduct virtually the same protocol and then, through risk-based monitoring, assessing which protocol they want to stick with (if any) and which study they will cancel. I have seen this personally occur three times this year while hearing the same from others in the industry at both the research site and CRO level. I do not believe this is a long term trend, rather I see this as a direct result of the relatively low supply of clinical trials this year and the high demand amongst CRO’s to want to win these studies. When study activity picks up next year, I think we will see less of this but at least for now, this is what we have to deal with.

Share Button

Help! My PI Doesn’t Want To Go To The Investigator Meeting, My Research Clinic Is Not Getting Paid and More!

Share Button



In this week’s video/podcast I cover a multitude of topics and get back to a bunch of viewer emails. The usual topics such as negotiating budgets and getting more studies are covered, but my favorite this week was a Site that almost turned down a study because their Principal Investigator din’t want to go to the Investigator Meeting! Under no circumstance should you ever do this. It is actually quite common for PI’s to refuse to go to IM’s, and while it may not look great for the Site, you will not lose the study. I hope you enjoy this video, and keep the questions rolling!
quotescover-JPG-73

Share Button

How A Research Clinic Can Pay Recruiters And Business Development Staff

Share Button


In this video I answer a viewer question on what are some of the best ways to pay patient recruiters or even business development staff. Hope it is helpful!

Share Button

Should A Research Company Have A LinkedIn Corporate Profile?

Share Button


The answer, as you would imagine from me is a resounding YES, but let me tell you a few reasons why it is important to have one.

-A good way to interact with employees and perhaps recruit future employees

-An excellent way to generate interest in your organization from Sponsor’s, CRO’s, and even potential study participants

but my favorite reason is…..

-Targeted ads!!! That’s right targeted ads are soon going to be available on LinkedIn where you can create an ad that will show up in the news stream of any specific job titles that you target. If you want more studies, just run a targeted ad aimed at Project Managers at various CRO’s and Sponsors! The challenge here will be to provide some content that will make it interesting enough for the individual to actually click on your ad. In other words, don’t make it look like an actual ad, but provide a valuable piece of content that also promotes your company’s services.

I am really excited about this and if you would like me and my team to work with you on these kind of targeted ads, send me an email or call me (you can find my contact info in the “My Bio” section of this blog).
quotescover-JPG-55

Share Button

Competition Is Fierce Amongst The CRO’s In Clinical Research!

Share Button


This video is a reaction to something that happened to one of the studies I have been working on where the Sponsor completely terminated the study and chose another CRO to run a virtually identical protocol. The take home message here is as a clinical research site, be prepared for anything to happen as far as studies being terminated and never take any study for granted.

Share Button